The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly


The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Staging for the Showdown

With the hopeful demise of the current SSPX / Rome accords now apparently over there seems to be a lasting fallout that has the potential to impact all, even laity, who attend SSPX chapels. In addition to those brave priests and bishops who previously spoke out, many are continuing to alert others of just how serious this problem really is. The important news is that many new priests are speaking out about the mission of the Society to preserve the priesthood and thereby the Mass and Sacraments.

Despite the current status of the Rome talks there has been much in the news concerning the key players involved not only in the talks but also within Rome and within the SSPX.

The first event was the leaking of another internal letter from the Secretary General of the SSPX in Econe, Fr. Christian Thouvenot. In it he confirms Bishop Fellay’s action to deprive Bishop Williamson of his office as a Chapter member for his taking of a position calling for rebellion and for continually repeated disobedience. He also forbade him from attending the ordinations at Econe. Apart from this he also deferred the ordination of the Dominicans of Avrille and the Capuchins of Morgon pending assurances of their loyalty to him.

These actions far from creating good will and reunification of the SSPX, only exacerbates the situation. It hammers even further the wedge placed by Rome of this ill-timed accord, effectively doing the job for Rome in splitting the Society. On the surface these actions would seem to be an act of petty revenge, but His Excellency Bishop Fellay is not vengeful in the sense of a child-like action such as this. He is more deliberate and astute in his thoughts and actions. I’ve read and seen comments on this from both lay and clergy who speculate that such actions are orchestrated not out of pettiness but to elicit a deeper goal. Whether it is to intentionally split the Society so he can take a faction and enter into full reconciliation with Rome or not, is pure speculation. However, it would seem to me that there is more to his actions than meets the eye.

In view of this, here are several pertinent news stories which thicken the situation:

Changes in the Curia

http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/en/homepage/the-vatican/detail/articolo/16263/

Archbishop DiNoia, Ecclesia Dei and the Society of St. Pius X
http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/archbishop-dinoia-ecclesia-dei-and-the-society-of-st.-pius-x/#ixzz1zeFf6dgT

 

German friend of liberation theologian named Vatican doctrinal czar

http://ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/german-friend-liberation-theologian-named-vatican-doctrinal-czar

SSPX Bishop de Galaretta Warns against New Head of CDF

New Head of CDF: Reportedly Denies Perpetual Virginity, Fan of Liberation Theology

http://op54rosary.ning.com/forum/topics/sspx-bishop-de-galaretta-warns-against-new-head-of-cdf-by-john-ve?xg_source=activity

It can be seen from the above articles that there is a jockeying for position on the part of Rome, possibly to project an image for the benefit of the SSPX and its adherents that under Pope Benedict XVI this may be the last hope for fuller communion with Rome. Perhaps also the latest actions by the leadership of the SSPX in Econe may also be jockeying for position to show Rome that they are cracking down on dissidents, formerly known as traditionalists.

At this time I would also like to quote the District Superior of the SSPX in the United States from his May-June 2012 letter: Do not be disturbed by the rumors, especially the different gossips on the Internet, based on feelings but surely not facts. Indeed, all the above sited articles are facts; speculation and gossip are never, to the best of my ability, part of my blog posts.

Continue to pray for the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and also pray the requested Novena to the Holy Ghost not only for the Chapter Meeting but also for all our SSPX bishops and priests that they may maintain the Gifts of the Holy Ghost, most especially fortitude and the fear of the Lord; and that they may preserve their monolithic unity as this is the strength of not only the SSPX but the overall strength of the Traditional Movement within the Catholic Church. Should an enemy from within or without manage to split this unity it will set back the cause of tradition years and even decades. Take heart, however, this is just another battle, we can be confident that the war is already won.

Richard of Danbury, D.S.G.

 

Advertisements

About Catholic Rural Solutions

This group is for the practical application of Catholic Distributist teachings as promoted by Pope St. Pius X, Belloc, Chesterton, Maurin and others in the 20th century. This group is also a respite for traditional Catholics who adhere to the Tridentine Rite of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and who share a concern for small independent Catholic communities throughout the world. These communities while primarily small holding farmers, craftsmen and tradesman all espouse an integrated life based on Catholic Social Justice and the Sacred Magisterium of the Church. Through this we intend to inject the Distributist economic principles into the greater society. Please fell free to share your experiences in this vein. Flaming, proselytizing and persecution WILL NOT BE TOLERATED.
This entry was posted in Current Events, The Faith. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly

  1. Without the risk of sounded petty or taking sides….Did not St. Thomas Aquinas “doubt” the perpetual Virginity of Our Lady? i have asked several Priests this and have never received a decent response. The best was from one Trad Priest…..”He may have taken a position of doubt agiainst the Virginity of Our Lady but if he was around during the Frist Vatican Council…he would have capitulated”. Nonetheless… I am sure this was a heated yet civilized topic of conversation with St. Thomas and his good friend St. Louis as they shared thier Froi gros and vintage Bordeaux. Why not a heated yet Civilized conversation now? I probably would argue that most Trads do not know St. Thomas position on this.

    • If I recall correctly it was not Mary’s Perpetual Virginity that St. Thomas A. questioned but her Immaculate Conception. He did say, however, that if the Church declared otherwise he would accept it as a Truth of Faith. Which, in fact, did happen.
      The Perpetual Virginity is a now a Dogma of Faith and therefore is not questioned.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s